A New and Improved Gospel? The Downfall of Hillsong

So I wrote this post a few years back and had it saved as a draft. Why I never posted it, I don't know--I have several blog posts that are in draft form. I have not posted any new blog posts in a few years. So, today I'm just going to publish this, well, because. How telling it is!! As most everyone knows, Carl Lentz was found to be a philanderer and abusive to people on his staff. And Brian Houston is a cad and so much more has been revealed about Hillsong in general that there's now no doubt their fruit is rotten--but we knew that.

One may ask, how can the Gospel of Jesus Christ be improved upon? The answer: it can't! The Bible is perfect, it is the inspired Word of God written for mankind to show that the only way to God is through Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God.

I am just an old fashioned gal; more precisely, I am a traditional, orthodox Christian who still believes that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is just as powerful to save as it ever was without adding any new and relevant interpretations. No tweeks or paraphrased versions of the "Gospel" are needed. The true Gospel is impervious to the age that we now live in and remains unchanged because there is nothing new under the sun. People are still born sinners the last I checked. We still try to get our own way and will justify it. By golly, we will not bat an eyelash at the opportunity to pervert and change the Gospel to fit our current day lives.

One example that comes to mind is the mega-church, Hillsong, in Australia and the one also in America in New York. Regarding a new film coming out about their church, a worship leader of the band says, "My hope is that the film gives people a "new perspective" of what it actually looks like to believe in who Jesus is, and what it means to live a life that reflects His acceptance and love." What exactly is this new perspective? It is none other than the watered down message of so many churches now-a-days. These seeker-friendly churches emphasize the love of Jesus without any qualifications on how the love of Jesus is shown and appropriated. Theirs is a gospel devoid of power and conviction. Did Jesus come JUST to show love? Didn't He also come to show us who we are...a people lost and driven from the love of Jesus? And then how does the love of Jesus transform us? Does the love of Jesus convict us of our sin and drive us to our knees? Of course it does, but this message is no longer relevant.  In addition to Hillsong's "new perspective", it was recently noted that Pastor Brian Houston removed from their college student handbook the word "homosexuality" as being one of those sinful practices to abstain from. They are now realizing that everyone is on a "journey" and that conversation is a must regarding this topic. Oh, the rubbish! It's their way of saying homosexuality is now on the list of acceptable behaviors for a regenerated Christian! Gay Christian. That is an oxymoron. And for the record, any church that has the name, Journey, well...stay away from it! Just my thought.

And just an FYI - any church that preaches a distorted gospel, e.g., one that eliminates the truth about sin, justification and holiness, it can be said that without a doubt, underneath the seductive layer of feel-good or legalistic teaching lurks the unmistakable reality of sexual sin in one form or another being practiced by both the leaders/pastors and/or their congregations -- freely and without rebuke.

Now, I am not saying that sexual sin, or ANY sin, for that matter, is not being committed in any normal, healthy church, however, it should not be condoned, rather it should be shown for what it is and the members of these churches must know that sin leads to death and that it must be dealt with. A healthy church will reveal it's members to be on the road to sanctification, moving away from sin, not toward it.

We are living in fantastic times. Fantastic in that what we see taking place in this day and age as far as Christianity goes is nothing short of truth-twisting! Did we ever think that sexual sin would be acceptable in our churches? Did we ever think that it would be acceptable to coddle the sinner in our churches? I sure didn't think it would happen in my lifetime. But it is here and it is gaining momentum. We as the true church of Jesus Christ must stand firm in our convictions that are rooted in biblical orthodoxy. We are living in the end times, people. It is a fact. We must especially be on guard, for our enemy goes about like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour. Devour means to consume recklessly, wantonly or destructively; to engulf or swallow up, etc.

Here is what makes Christianity so beautiful -- Jesus never, ever condoned sin; as we know, He told those to whom He ministered to go and sin no more. His message of love can be summed up this way...1) We are sinners on a direct route to hell. 2) He came to give His life as a ransom for our sin. 3) We accept His unfathomable gift of forgiveness and repent of our sin and place our trust in Christ as Savior. 4) Indescribably, He credits us with His righteousness. Simply put, He gives us His righteousness as a robe to cover our unrighteousness. It doesn't just cover, it takes it away completely! I do not recommend RC Sproul, but he worded this truthfully, "we are just (righteous) without being just (righteous)." At the moment we receive Christ, at the moment of conversion, we are wrapped in the love of God, wrapped in robes of righteousness, cleansed by the blood of the Lamb. In His sight we are now holy and just, and then begins the process of sanctification. The price was paid in full by the death and sacrifice of the spotless Son of God. This is reason to rejoice!!

In the words of Matthew Henry, "Grace despised is grace forfeited." And, "Those that persist in sin make war against God." Which side are you on? Are you on the side of the obstinate or the side of the humbled?

Today is the day of salvation. Today Jesus is saying to you, "Go and sin no more".

The Shack - False Jesus Misleading Many

DANGER!

With The Shack in theaters it will be no surprise if it's a highly popular movie due to the major hit of the book of the same name which was written by William P Young. God has provided the way to life, but you won't find the way by watching the movie or reading the book. With this information I find it impossible to remain silent in light of it's many problems and direct contradiction to Scripture.

People must be made aware of it's subversive nature; namely it's false gospel message. In no way does it represent the God of the Bible, but rather a universal god with no power to save or send to hell. This impotent god makes everything all right just by being "loving". In that sense is that all God is...... is loving? Does not love also encompass judgment and wrath? You cannot love a thing without hating it's opposite. Jesus Himself said in Matthew 6:24, "No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." God loved the world enough to send His Son to die, but He also hates sin. And sin is serious enough that it sends people who sin to hell.

God loved His Son and gave Him to be the propitiation for our sins. Because He laid the sin of the whole world upon Him and poured out His wrath in an incredible display of holy retribution and turned His back on His only Son, if only but for a moment, is why it is so important to understand what exactly His death on the cross represents. 1 John 2:2, "And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world." Isaiah 53:5, "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon Him; and with His stripes we are healed." Because of the preciousness of this sacrifice it is short-sighted to believe that minimizing the cross somehow makes His love just as meaningful. To say that God doesn't punish sin because sin is it's own punishment (what the movie/book says) is as if to say Jesus Himself did not die on the cross and suffer the accompanying agony. But, in fact He agonized, He was punished for our sin, He was separated from His Father, He who knew no sin died in our place. But no matter because everyone, whether they repent and believe or not will be in heaven according to the message that this movie sends. That is flat-out Universalism. The Shack states that, "In Jesus, I have forgiven all humans for their sins against me, but only some choose relationship.” A large, black woman whose name is Papa is supposed to be God the Father. Why would a book portray God as woman? I know, God is supposedly trying to make Himself appear more approachable because the subject character can't take God as a man, apparently. God does not change to suit us humans, sorry. And going to a place where you portray God in human form is just plain wrong. In the words of theologian Bruce Waltke, "It is inexcusable hubris and idolatry on the part of mortals to change the images by which the eternal God chooses to represent Himself." (Old Testament Theology 244). This so-called Papa says at one point, "Honey, I've never placed an expectation on you or anyone else.  The idea behind expectations requires that someone does not know the future or outcome and is trying to control behavior to get the desired result." He can't be serious!? God doesn't put expectations on us? Let's look at a few scriptures to disprove this...1 Peter 1:16, "Because it is written, be ye holy; for I am holy." Luke 13:5, "I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish."

To call this a Christian movie is blasphemy. It takes Christ off the cross and puts man on his own supposed cross of suffering in this world as his own payment for sin. Cross be gone. Christ be gone.

So take my advice and don't waste your money on this deceptive and beguiling movie that paints Jesus in the wrong light; a light which is darkness. Luke 11:35, "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness."

See also: https://ilikemycoffeeblack.com/2017/02/24/the-shack-is-messed-up/

Tips on Assessing Worship Music

                                Criteria for Discerning the Usefulness of Praise Songs

Very excellent guidelines (not complicated!) for determining whether praise/worship songs are valid and Biblically based.

From: Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller

Determining the truth of what someone is saying is impossible if the person isn't actually saying anything. This is the great difficulty of assessing praise songs commonly used in the church. The nature of modern praise songs makes them difficult to make useful judgments regarding their fitness for use in the church's worship. Often the songs are written in sentence fragments, thought and phrases rather than a regular sentence with a subject, verb and object. Simple questions are often unanswerable: “Who is this talking about?” “What does this mean?” “What is the relationship between one phrase and another?”

When I was a child we would play a game on the 4th of July. Some smarty would take a tub of Vaseline and slather up a watermelon and toss it into the swimming pool. Dozens of kids would try to get it out of the water. Anytime you thought you had a hold of the melon it would squirt out of your arms. This is something of the difficulty in making a clear judgment about such ambiguous lyrics. (Of course this ambiguity is a big part of the problem.)

What is needed, then, is an objective method of judging the usefulness of a praise song for edifying the Lord's church and bringing the comfort of the forgiveness of sins.

The following criteria are offered for use in considering the usefulness of praise songs.

1. Jesus

“Is Jesus mentioned?”

          Yes             No              If yes, is it in name or concept?

2. Clarity

Is the song clear? Does it use sentences (with subject, verb, object) or sentence fragments?

                    10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  2  1

           Very clear                       Obscure

3. Mysticism (Subjectivity vs Objectivity)

Is the song about the things that God has done (objective), or about my own emotions and experiences (subjective)? Does the song repeat the same phrases over and over in an hypnotic mantra?

                  10  9  8   7 6   5 4  3  2  1

             Objective                      Subjective

4. Law and Gospel 

Does the song proclaim the law in its sternness and the Gospel in its sweetness (the Gospel is the promise of the forgiveness of all sins won for us through Jesus' death on the cross)? Are law and Gospel rightly divided (and not mixed up)? Is the law presented as something that we can do, or does it show us our sins? Is the Gospel conditional (based on my actions, decisions, acceptance)?

              Yes             No           I can't tell

5. Is there any explicit false teaching?

               Yes            No

From: http://www.hope-aurora.org/docs/praisesongcruncher.pdf

Focus on the Family Misses it and More...

The Christian ministry, Focus on the Family, has been on a downgrade for years. I have decided to bring attention to this destructive trend in so-called Christianity in which they are a strong voice. Their programs air multiple times a day on the radio here in Colorado so it is hard to miss them.

A while back Jim Daly interviewed Bono and with raised eyebrow I listened as he said things like, Bono is not your conventional Christian or something to that effect and that he had colorful language. Colorful indeed!! Bono uses foul language and is a hardcore anti-Christian man who thinks anyone who adheres to historical, biblical Christianity is a Pharisee. He mocks us, in fact. But FotF is willing to overlook that because he does so much good in the world...but not in the name of the Christ of the Bible, so why did they even give him an interview? It should also be noted that FotF has been trending toward Catholicism for quite some time, which also includes Contemplative Spirituality, if they aren't already fully embracing the Catholic religion. That's another story for another time.

I think the final straw for me was the article on www.christianpost.com HERE where Jim Daly, the President of FotF, defended his ministry reviewing the filthy movie, 'Fifty Shades of Grey', by stating that it was necessary to warn the Christian public about it's evils...of course, to see for themselves just how evil it was, their reviewer, Paul Asay, of their "Plugged In" movie review SITE mentioned that it was his job to expose the dark by bringing a bit of light to this movie. As if the secular reviews weren't explicit enough he found it necessary to go see for himself. Huh?? I can remain silent no more!! What is further causing my blood to boil is his condescending response to someone who sent him an email that said, "....and I am troubled at the thought of sending one of your employees to go see it.” Asay responds, "I love this email. I so appreciate that he, and many other readers, worry about us over here. And pray for us, too. The sentiment and supplication both mean a lot." Uh-huh, I wonder if that would be his response to someone like me who says he is a hypocrite and how dare he present himself as being pious by watching the movie; a movie by the way, where if a Christian unknowingly (not likely) attended, within a very short amount of time, I'm guessing, would up and leave in protest, but not this fella, no, he was going to give a detailed account of the vile stuff. Shame, shame on him! At the end of his review he writes, "It’s not very bright, this little light of mine. But in the darkness, every little bit helps. And I hope that my tiny light of a movie review might lead others to a better, brighter one." I think the verse in Luke 11:35 fits nicely, "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness."

I wrote a response (some slight changes) to Paul Asay's defense on the Plugged In site..we'll see if my comment gets published, as well as on Christian Post in response to Jim Daly's article which was published. Here it is:

"My blood boils when a Christian ministry defends an action that is clearly outside the bounds of Christian duty. It is the duty of the Christian to avoid any semblance of evil and the fact that Jim Daly is making excuses as to why their ministry went to the movie is unconscionable!! You should be ashamed of yourself! You are a hypocrite."

But then this is the ministry that defended interviewing Bono who twists Scripture, scoffing at it. But to FotF it's defensible because this man does so much in the name of philanthropy. Focus, you are a legalistic organization which puts the actions of people over and above their belief system. You are not promoting the interests of Christ but the interests of people who want a watered down version of the Gospel. And the fact that you defend actually going to and seeing what should've been an X rated movie merely for review purposes implies voyeurism and titillation. How dare you defend this, but one thing is for sure...you have shown your true colors.

The Bible is Not Practical!

South Park, Co


You know, I get frustrated when I read about what is going on in our churches today. Have we all gone mad? Have we lost our love of the truth? Is Christianity just another way to live life, as in, adding Him to our life as an accessory to make our lives more fulfilling? And is the Bible just a guide-book? If this is our approach, oh! how we are missing the very life-giving, life-changing (from the inside-out), life-breath that God offers us! The Bible's words are alive. It says in Hebrews 4:12, "For the word of God is alive and active, sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow, it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." 

So below check out the article that sounds a warning to current day Christianity by Phil Cooke.

This explains how some Pastors are teaching the Bible to their congregations. Click HERE to read this blog.

Mtn Girl

Christian Sanctification May be Different Than You Think

   Photo taken at Red Rocks in Morrison, Co

                                            

 Sanctify them through Thy truth. — John 17:17

How can the love of truth sanctify us? Isn't sanctification just avoiding sin and trying to do good? No, it isn't. The doing or not doing isn't the question...that isn't what sanctifies. The very strange thing about Christianity is that it is different from other religions...very different. Actually Christianity turns religion on it's head. We as fallen people, born into sin resort to thinking that if we are "good" then we are right with God and will go to heaven. The Bible says something entirely different; it says no one can be good enough, no one can establish a righteousness of their own. We fight to be right, to make ourselves appear good and not evil. But we are evil -- the Bible says our righteousness is as filthy rags. The beautiful reality is that the remedy has been provided for us by the death of Jesus Christ on the cross. The only righteousness that saves is the righteousness that is imputed to us by Christ. It is a free gift -- we cannot earn it. 

Consider the words of Charles Spurgeon below. He reveals this wonderful truth that says the love of it is what sanctifies. Truth informs; it dispels the darkness and it sets us free!

"Sanctification begins in regeneration. The Spirit of God infuses into man that new living principle by which he becomes "a new creature" in Christ Jesus. This work, which begins in the new birth, is carried on in two ways-mortification, whereby the lusts of the flesh are subdued and kept under; and vivification, by which the life which God has put within us is made to be a well of water springing up unto everlasting life. This is carried on every day in what is called "perseverance," by which the Christian is preserved and continued in a gracious state, and is made to abound in good works unto the praise and glory of God; and it culminates or comes to perfection, in "glory," when the soul, being thoroughly purged, is caught up to dwell with holy beings at the right hand of the Majesty on high. But while the Spirit of God is thus the author of sanctification, yet there is a visible agency employed which must not be forgotten. "Sanctify them," said Jesus, "through thy truth: thy word is truth." The passages of Scripture which prove that the instrument of our sanctification is the Word of God are very many. The Spirit of God brings to our minds the precepts and doctrines of truth, and applies them with power. These are heard in the ear, and being received in the heart, they work in us to will and to do of God's good pleasure. The truth is the sanctifier, and if we do not hear or read the truth, we shall not grow in sanctification. We only progress in sound living as we progress in sound understanding. "Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path." Do not say of any error, "It is a mere matter of opinion." No man indulges an error of judgment, without sooner or later tolerating an error in practice. Hold fast the truth, for by so holding the truth shall you be sanctified by the Spirit of God."

Say yes to the truth, say yes to God.

God bless you today,

Mtn Girl

Rescued....

The word "rescued" conjures up many thoughts on the subject. I'd like to mention a few things about being rescued, but first, here are a few synonyms that describe the word:

Liberate, release, save, redeem, ransom, extricate, recover, liberation, deliverance, release, redemption and recovery. Wow. These words ring "FREEDOM", don't they?

As you can imagine, this applies to us as Christians. This is what it's about, people! But all too often the true meaning of salvation through Christ is twisted to mean something other than it is. For instance, a teaching that is spreading like wildfire throughout Christendom is that God is not a God of judgment, not a God of wrath. For some reason perhaps they think it will offend the unbeliever to include the "less desirable" aspects of God, so they make it more palatable to the masses. If God doesn't punish sin, if God is not a God of justice, if God isn't wrathful against evil, then what does He stand for? What is He rescuing us from? If God is only a God of love, where is the rest of the equation? You can't love fiercely unless you hate fiercely. If you love that which is good, right and holy then you must hate that which is loathsome, wrong and evil.

And so God is a God of love and God is a God of hate. I wrote a comment on a site that referenced the upcoming movie, 'Son of God'. The author of the article said, "...it failed to reveal who the true Son of God is" (my paraphrase). In my comment, in which I agreed with the author, I wrote that God's love is a double-edged sword that pierces and divides and demands that the one He loves give Him their heart, their mind, their very life -- none of this nauseating fluff that Jesus is there to make your life easier.

So when God demands that we love Him with all our heart, soul, strength, and mind, He is saying, essentially, in our doing so, we will be freed from self, from our own evil desires and sinfulness. We will be set free from our sin and we will be given a new nature. How glorious! Freed from sin, rescued from death! But only God Himself can free us from ourselves.

So, yes, I've been rescued. Rescued from darkness and all the things associated with it. A life devoid of God. Darkness. Spiritual Death. Empty. Aimless. I was as it says in Ephesians 2:12, "....without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having NO HOPE, and WITHOUT GOD in the world."

Call out to Him, He's there. He will rescue you.


Mtn Girl